Do you have favorite words? My guess is you do. Each of us has a preferred vocabulary storehouse from which we draw to think, speak, and write.
My vocabulary storehouse holds some words simply because of how they sound rolling off the tongue. These are the words I use generously—words like quirky, glisten, gladsome, and paltry.
Conversely, there are words I dislike simply because of how they sound rolling off the tongue—words like ointment, moist, and belly. I avoid these words if at all possible.
One word I have invited into my storehouse is peruse. I love how the second syllable hesitates and lingers on the tongue. But because of the way it sounds, I have attached an incorrect definition to it. Here’s a typical way I’ve used peruse in the past:
I had an extra hour, so I went to the bookstore to peruse the stacks.
In this context, I define peruse as thoughtful, happy wandering. According to the Oxford American Dictionary, I am wrong. Take a look at the definition:
peruse :: verb [ trans. ] formal
read thoroughly or carefully | examine carefully or at length
When I wander about the bookstore, I am not perusing the stacks at all. To do so would take an incalculable amount of time. The word I need in this case is skim:
skim :: verb [ trans. ]
read (something) quickly or cursorily so as to note only the important points
As in: I had an extra hour, so I went to the bookstore to skim the stacks.
My WWW verdict? I’ve been using the wrong word because I like the way the wrong word sounds. [sigh.] Now I need to retrain my brain to insert skim instead of peruse. I hope I can learn new tricks.
What about you, my fellow word nerds? Do you play favorites with words because of the way they sound? Let your voice be heard in the poll.
And if your vote was yea, which words or word sounds bug you? Share those in the comments—let’s be bugged together.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010 at 11:25 am
Mainly, I’m looking at name combinations when they bother me. I’m a fiction writer, so the way that names sound is important to me. If the name somehow stumbles, I don’t use it. Some folks even have names in real life that I tend to think of as poorly thought out. Then again, not all of us care about that kind of thing. I hope I’m not too neurotic.
That’s a solid point, Cimmorene—if a name catches b/c it’s difficult to say together, I always wonder what the parents were thinking! And in writing, when the reader will see the name again and again, it is the author’s job to choose wisely to make the name fit. Have you ever needed a character with a choppy name to illustrate something the reader should know? Fascinating! Thanks for stopping in. —es
Thursday, September 30, 2010 at 10:56 am
It’s so funny, I absolutely hate the word “ointment”! It’s just so weird!
And it’s not really that I hate a word, I mostly hate when people use the word incorrectly. For example, using etc. after you list like one thing (On my sandwich I want it all, ham, etc.). That irks me. But I was confused about peruse right along with you!
~SmrtChka
eew! ointment is a sister to moist. That’s a funny about using etc. for a sandwich, as if there is a standard set of items to add and everyone knows it! I have lots of those, and WWW may cover some of them in the future. Thanks for stopping in and sharing. —es
Saturday, October 2, 2010 at 9:24 pm
It is hard to give “peruse” the boot. “Skim” has such utilitarian undertones—fairly cursory, missing the mark of any form of enrichment, interest, or pleasure.
There is a definition for “peruse” of generally reading over with an implication of leisureliness without the sense of thoroughness. This can be found in the massive unabridged Oxford English Dictionary (a 20 volume set which I do not own). I have never heard a professor tell a student to go home and peruse their textbook for an upcoming exam.
Erin, being the “vocab good girl” that you are … you most likely have already been diligently retraining your mind on using this definition in its most formal sense. I, on the other hand, am going rogue on this issue.
You are too funny—vocab good girl—actually, it’s like I am mourning the loss of a good friend. You go rogue, girl! Enjoy your language freedom. :) —es
OK friend, rather than going down this murky path… can you find an equally pleasing word as “peruse”, (omitting browse) with leisurely pleasure in the read?
For sure… we all play favorites with words for a variety of reasons… even unbending rogues!
Saturday, October 2, 2010 at 9:28 pm
And… yes… great post!
Monday, July 18, 2011 at 5:15 pm
Peruse is a real perplexer. Merriam-Webster defines peruse:
a : to examine or consider with attention and in detail : study
b : to look over or through in a casual or cursory manner
WTH? Which is it?
The first entry is the original and traditional definition. Why is the second entry provided? Well, the dictionary tells you HOW a word is being used, not necessarily how it SHOULD be used. When popular usage strays from original definitions, M-W lists the popular usage too. Most people who are interested in traditional usage will dig a bit to discover the original meaning. Really, this is what inspired me to start WWW—there are so many words that are used improperly, I find it fascinating! History shows, however, that once general use shifts to an alternate definition, we’re on the slippery slope and the original will likely go under. Sort of sad, eh? —es